Đây là đề thi thử vào 10 môn Anh (điều kiên + chuyên) của hai trường Hà Nội – Amsterdam và trường chuyên Nguyễn Huệ đợt vừa rồi. Mỗi đề đều đã được đính kèm đáp án. Hy vọng đây sẽ là nguồn tài liệu đáng quý dành cho các bạn (đặc biệt là khối chuyên Anh) Continue reading
Hello you guys. This is the test compilation we have been working on for so long. Now, I’m very pleased to introduce you: MOCK TESTS 2014 made by ESAS TEAM. Yay ! 😀
This book comprises 7 mock tests with an additional past paper from 2012-2013 (Hanoi). Each test includes 4 parts: Listening, Vocabulary and Grammar, Reading and Writing and the overall score for each test is 10 points. I hope that through this book, you will get more confidence in taking the coming entrance exam in this June and show more self-esteem on proving your ability on the test. The reference materials were recorded in the last page so you can find them and explore more.
DUE TO THE FACT THAT THIS IS THE FIRST VERSION OF THE BOOK, IT WILL HAVE SOME SMALL MISTAKES. I HOPE YOU WILL HAVE SOME RESPONSES TO BUILD UP OUR BOOK MORE. PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY COPIES OF THIS BOOK IN OTHER WEBSITES WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION FIRST. THE BOOK CAN BE DOWNLOADED OFFICIALLY ON THIS WEBSITE Continue reading
Hello, you guys ! Finally, the latest general module mock test has finally come out. I hope you enjoy this test. By the way, there will be a big surprise for you in this May, and my revelation is that it relates to people who are going to attend the high school entrance examination (general module only). OK. HERE IS THE LINK
Hey, guys ! The new test has finally publicized. This time, the listening test was set too be more difficult (in marks, not in its hardness, :v). The writing part demands each question 0,3 points, but you guys can mark 0,1 already since it makes no sense why your handwriting so bad, right ?? Hehe, that’s enough for the joke. I just want to say: ENJOY. And this time, please comment even you don’t like it or not because our website is becoming not merrier without comments. Like we have said THE MORE, THE MERRIER ! And happy new year (I mean Happy Tet Holiday, we are Vietnamese, right ??)
OK. Here is the link:
TEST PAPER + ANSWER KEY: https://app.box.com/s/41b0un47wqpqxatf99b6deosikmxac54
Good luck and success !
ENJOY ! EXPLANATION IS ADDED IN FOR YOU TO RECOGNIZE
Good luck and success !
How was your first mock test in Nguyen Hue High School ? Was it difficult or somebody did the test with ease ? Well, all the better to make first improvement then come to a newer stage. Right ? So today I will update the next test in this year general training module. Hope you enjoy and leave a comment and tell me how do you think about the mock test ? Especially students who are doing major at Physics, Maths, Chemistry…Tell me 🙂
TEST PAPER + AUDIO FILE: https://app.box.com/s/jxrh4x73tescex1jqdcfefwnrwi26ld1
Good luck and success !
PART 1 (12 pts)
Reading Passage has seven paragraphs A-G.
Choose the most suitable headings for paragraphs C-G from the list of headings below.
Write the appropriate numbers i-x in boxes 29-33 on your answer sheet.
List of Headings
|i||The Crick and Watson approach to research|
|ii||Antidotes to bacterial infection|
|iii||The testing of hypotheses|
|iv||Explaining the inductive method|
|v||Anticipating results bef ore data is collected|
|vi||How research is done and how it is reported|
|vii||The role of hypotheses in scientific research|
|viii||Deducing the consequences of hypotheses|
|ix||Kar l Popper’s claim that the scientific method is hypothetico- deductive|
|x||The unbiased researcher|
Paragraph A ix
33 Paragraph G
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD
|A ‘Hypotheses,’ saidMedawar in 1964,‘are imaginative and inspirational in
character’; they are ‘adventures of the
mind’. He was arguing in favour of the
position taken by Karl Popper in The
Logic of Scientific Discovery (1972, 3rd
edition) that the nature of scientific
methodis hypothetico-deductive and
not, asis generally believed, inductive.
B It is essential that you, as an intending
researcher, understand the difference
between these two interpretations of the
research process so that you do not
become discouraged or begin to suffer
from a feeling of ‘cheating’ or not going
about it the right way.
C The myth of scientific method is that it is
inductive: that the formulation of
scientific theory starts with the basic,
raw evidence of the senses – simple,
unbiased, unprejudiced observation. Out
of these sensory data – commonly
referred to as ‘facts’ — generalisations
will form. The myth is that from a
disorderly array of factual information
an orderly, relevant theory will
somehow emerge. However, the s tarting
point of induction is an impossible one.
D There is no such thing as an unbiased
observation. Every act of observation
we make is a function of what we have
seen or otherwise experienced in the
past. All scientific work of an
experimental or exploratory nature starts
with s ome expectation about the
outcome. This expectation is a
hypothesis. Hypotheses provide the
initiative and incentive for the inquiry
and influence the method. It is in the
light of an expectation that s ome
observations are held to be relevant and
some irrelevant, that one methodology
is chosen and others discarded, that
some experiments are conducted and
others are not. Where is, your naive,
pure and objective researcher now?
be correct then your hypothesis has been
supported and may be retained until
such time as some further test shows it
not to be correct. Once you have arrived
at your hypothesis, which is a product of
your imagination, you then proceed to a
strictly logical and rigorous process,
based upon deductive argument —
hence the term ‘hypothetico-deductive’.
|E Hypotheses arise by guesswork, or byinspiration, but having been formulated
they can and must be tested rigorously,
using the appropriate methodology. If
the predictions you make as a result of
deducing certain consequences from
your hypothesis are not shown to be
correct then you discard or modify your
hypothesis. If the predictions turn out to
F So don’t worry if you have some idea of
what your results will tell you before
you even begin to collect data; there are
no scientists in existence who really wait
until they have all the evidence in front
of them bef ore they try to work out what
it might possibly mean. The closest we
ever get to this situation is when
something happens by accident; but
even then the researcher has to
formulate a hypothesis to be tested
before being sure that, for example, a
mould might prove to be a successful
antidote to bacterial infection.
G The myth of scientific method is not
only that it is inductive (which we have
seen is incorrect) but also that the
hypothetico-deductive method proceeds
in a step-by-step, inevitable fashion. The
hypothetico-deductive method describes
the logical approach to much research
work, but it does not describe the
psychological behaviour that brings it
about. This is much more holistic —
involving guesses , reworkings,
corrections, blind alleys and above all
inspiration, in the deductive as well as
the hypothetic component -thanis
immediately apparent f rom reading the
f inal thesis or published papers. These
have been, quite properly, organised into
a more serial, logical order so that the
worth of the output may be evaluated
independently of the behavioural
processes by which it was obtained. It is
the difference, for example between the
academic papers with which Crick and
Watson demonstrated the structure of
the DNA molecule and the fascinating
book The Double Helix in which Watson
(1968) described how they did it. From
this point of view, ‘scientific method’
may more usefully be thought of as a
way of writing up research rather than as
a way of carrying it out.
Questions 6 and 7
In which TWO paragraphs in reading passage does the writer give advice directly to the reader?
Write the TWO appropriate letters (A—G) in boxes 6 and 7 on your answer sheet.
Do the following statements reflect the opinions of the writer in Reading Passage ?
In boxes 7-10 on your answer sheet write
YES if the statement reflects the opinion of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the opinion of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
7 Popper says that the scientific method is hypothetico-deductive.
8 If a prediction based on a hypothesis is fulfilled, then the hypothes is is confirmed as true.
9 Many people carry out research in a mistaken way.
10 The ‘scientific method’ is more a way of describing res earch than a way of doing it.
Choose the appropriate letter A-D and write it in box 12 on your answer sheet.
Which of the following statements bes t describes the writer’s main purpose in Reading Passage ?
A to advise Ph.D students not to cheat while carrying out research
B to encouragePh.D students to work by guesswork and inspiration
C to explain to Ph. D students the logic which the scientific research paper follows
D to help Ph. D students by explaining different conceptions of the research process
THAT’S THE END OF PART 1. NOW TURN TO PART 2 !
TURN OVER THE NEXT PAGE
(For more, click on this link: https://app.box.com/s/xtlmklg2vq1evx222cjz)
Good luck and success !